Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20931610›Full record

ReviewReviews in medical virology2010

CMV in critically ill patients: pathogen or bystander?

Ajit P Limaye, Michael Boeckh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in medical virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cytomegalovirus Viremia and Clinical Outcomes in Kenyan Children Diagnosed With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Hospital.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. EBV DNA increase in COVID-19 patients with impaired lymphocyte subpopulation count.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ajit P LimayeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington and Program in Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. limaye@uw.edu
Michael Boeckh
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

A Randomzied Phase II Trial of CMV Prevention in Acute Lung InjuryU01HL102547 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOECKH, MICHAEL J, LIMAYE, ABHIJIT PRAKASH · 2010 to 2014
$5.9M
IL-10 & PD-1 Modulation to Reduce CMV Disease Incidence in Solid Organ RecipientsR21AI084019 · NIAID · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI LA ROSA, CORINNA, LIMAYE, ABHIJIT PRAKASH · 2009 to 2010
$461k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1 U01 HL102547-01NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL102547NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI084019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite broad variability in study populations, methodologies for CMV detection, and analytic methods used, multiple studies have documented frequent CMV infection in non-immunocompromised adults with critical illness due to a variety of causes. Higher rates of CMV infection in studies of seropositive patients suggest that reactivation of latent infection rather than primary infection is the main mechanism in this setting. Risk factors for CMV reactivation (other than seropositivity) have not been clearly defined and there does not appear to be a consistent association with severity of illness. Furthermore, CMV reactivation in this setting has been associated with important adverse clinical outcomes, including increased duration of mechanical ventilation, longer length of stay and all-cause mortality. There are several biologically plausible mechanisms that could link CMV reactivation with adverse outcomes, including: direct lung injury (CMV pneumonia), amplification of inflammation systemically and within the lung, or predisposition to other nosocomial infections, but clinical data in the ICU setting are limited. Further observational studies are unlikely to significantly advance our understanding of the role of CMV in critically ill patients. Given the significant impact of critical illness, limited current therapeutic options, the availability of generally well-tolerated antiviral options for CMV, and the clinical data supporting a possible pathogenic role for CMV, there is a strong rationale for a randomised controlled trial of CMV prevention as a novel means of improving the outcomes of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsHumansIntensive Care UnitsRisk FactorsVirus Activation

Identifiers

PMID20931610
PMCPMC2987685
OpenAlexW2072562300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.