Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20930528›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2010

A conserved G₁ regulatory circuit promotes asynchronous behavior of nuclei sharing a common cytoplasm.

Dhanalakshmi R Nair, Cori A D'Ausilio, Patricia Occhipinti, Mark E Borsuk, Amy S Gladfelter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A phase oscillator model of cell cycles reveals nuclear density control in a branched fungal network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Skeletal muscle fibers count on nuclear numbers for growth.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Sporulation inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Cellular and metabolic engineering of oleaginous yeastEngineering in life sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell-Size Control.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  13. Nuclear autonomy in multinucleate fungi.Current opinion in microbiology · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell size control in yeast.Current biology : CB · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Dhanalakshmi R NairDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Cori A D'Ausilio
Patricia Occhipinti
Mark E Borsuk
Amy S Gladfelter
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Molecular and Cellular Biology at DartmouthT32GM008704 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI COMPTON, DUANE A. · 1998 to 2018
$6.8M
Cytoplasmic Organization by phase transitionsR01GM081506 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GLADFELTER, AMY S · 2010 to 2023
$4.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081506NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008704NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthesis and accumulation of conserved cell cycle regulators such as cyclins are thought to promote G₁/S and G₂/M transitions in most eukaryotes. When cells at different stages of the cell cycle are fused to form heterokaryons, the shared complement of regulators in the cytoplasm induces the nuclei to become synchronized. However, multinucleate fungi often display asynchronous nuclear division cycles, even though the nuclei inhabit a shared cytoplasm. Similarly, checkpoints can induce nuclear asynchrony in multinucleate cells by arresting only the nucleus that receives damage. The cell biological basis for nuclear autonomy in a common cytoplasm is not known. Here we show that in the filamentous fungus Ashbya gossypii, sister nuclei born from one mitosis immediately lose synchrony in the subsequent G₁ interval. A conserved G₁ transcriptional regulatory circuit involving the Rb-analogue Whi5p promotes the asynchronous behavior yet Whi5 protein is uniformly distributed among nuclei throughout the cell cycle. The homologous Whi5p circuit in S. cerevisiae employs positive feedback to promote robust and coherent entry into the cell cycle. We propose that positive feedback in this same circuit generates timing variability in a multinucleate cell. These unexpected findings indicate that a regulatory program whose products (mRNA transcripts) are translated in a common cytoplasm can nevertheless promote variability in the individual behavior of sister nuclei.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCell NucleusCyclinsCytoplasmFungal ProteinsG1 PhaseMitosisRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsCyclinsFungal ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20930528
PMCPMC3047801
OpenAlexW2041191989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.