Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20928883›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2011

Long-term MR cell tracking of neural stem cells grafted in immunocompetent versus immunodeficient mice reveals distinct differences in contrast between live and dead cells.

Stacey Cromer Berman, Chulani Galpoththawela, Assaf A Gilad, Jeff W M Bulte, Piotr Walczak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Advanced functional materials · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neurological Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stacey Cromer BermanDivision of MR Research, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Chulani Galpoththawela
Assaf A Gilad
Jeff W M Bulte
Piotr Walczak
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

MR Tracking of Magnetically Labeled Stem Cells in CNSR01NS045062 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W. · 2003 to 2013
$4.4M
Developing MPI for Non-Invasive and Quantitative Imaging of Stem CellsR01DA026299 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W. · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Imaging of gene delivery in the central nervous systemR21EB008769 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILAD, ASSAF A · 2009 to 2010
$458k
Monitoring Neuronal Activity and Inducible Gene Expression using MRIR21NS065284 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILAD, ASSAF A · 2009 to 2010
$411k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB008769NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026299NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045062NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS065284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cell (NSC)-based therapy is actively being pursued in preclinical and clinical disease models. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cell tracking promises to optimize current cell transplantation paradigms, however, it is limited by dilution of contrast agent during cellular proliferation, transfer of label from dying cells to surrounding endogenous host cells, and/or biodegradation of the label. Here, we evaluated the applicability of magnetic resonance imaging for long-term tracking of transplanted neural stem cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide and transfected with the bioluminescence reporter gene luciferase. Mouse neural stem cells were transplanted into immunodeficient, graft-accepting Rag2 mice or immunocompetent, graft-rejecting Balb/c mice. Hypointense voxel signals and bioluminescence were monitored over a period of 93 days. Unexpectedly, in mice that rejected the cells, the hypointense MR signal persisted throughout the entire time-course, whereas in the nonrejecting mice, the contrast cleared at a faster rate. In immunocompetent, graft-rejecting Balb/c mice, infiltrating leukocytes, and microglia were found surrounding dead cells and internalizing superparamagnetic iron oxide clusters. The present results indicate that live cell proliferation and associated label dilution may dominate contrast clearance as compared with cell death and subsequent transfer and retention of superparamagnetic iron oxide within phagocytes and brain interstitium. Thus, interpretation of signal changes during long-term MR cell tracking is complex and requires caution.

Indexed as

Cell TrackingImmunocompetenceAnimalsBrainCell SurvivalContrast MediaDextransGraft RejectionLuminescent MeasurementsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeural Stem CellsContrast MediaDextransferumoxidesMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID20928883
PMCPMC3031985
OpenAlexW1980450093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.