Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20927408›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Neuroimaging study designs, computational analyses and data provenance using the LONI pipeline.

Ivo Dinov, Kamen Lozev, Petros Petrosyan, Zhizhong Liu, Paul Eggert, Jonathan Pierce, Alen Zamanyan, Shruthi Chakrapani, John Van Horn, D Stott Parker and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Global and Regional Changes in Perivascular Space in Idiopathic and Familial Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ivo DinovLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Kamen Lozev
Petros Petrosyan
Zhizhong Liu
Paul Eggert
Jonathan Pierce
Alen Zamanyan
Shruthi Chakrapani
John Van Horn
D Stott Parker
Rico Magsipoc
Kelvin Leung
Boris Gutman
Roger Woods
Arthur Toga

Funding

Center for Computational Biology (RMI)U54RR021813 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2004 to 2010
$25.3M
YALE CENTER FOR THE: LEARNING &ATTENTIONP41RR013642 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BEARER, ELAINE L · 1998 to 2011
$21.9M
Collaborative Brain Mapping: Tools for SharingR01MH071940 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2004 to 2008
$3.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 5 P41RR013642NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR013642NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR021813NIMH NIH HHS 5 R01 MH71940NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern computational neuroscience employs diverse software tools and multidisciplinary expertise to analyze heterogeneous brain data. The classical problems of gathering meaningful data, fitting specific models, and discovering appropriate analysis and visualization tools give way to a new class of computational challenges--management of large and incongruous data, integration and interoperability of computational resources, and data provenance. We designed, implemented and validated a new paradigm for addressing these challenges in the neuroimaging field. Our solution is based on the LONI Pipeline environment [3], [4], a graphical workflow environment for constructing and executing complex data processing protocols. We developed study-design, database and visual language programming functionalities within the LONI Pipeline that enable the construction of complete, elaborate and robust graphical workflows for analyzing neuroimaging and other data. These workflows facilitate open sharing and communication of data and metadata, concrete processing protocols, result validation, and study replication among different investigators and research groups. The LONI Pipeline features include distributed grid-enabled infrastructure, virtualized execution environment, efficient integration, data provenance, validation and distribution of new computational tools, automated data format conversion, and an intuitive graphical user interface. We demonstrate the new LONI Pipeline features using large scale neuroimaging studies based on data from the International Consortium for Brain Mapping [5] and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [6]. User guides, forums, instructions and downloads of the LONI Pipeline environment are available at http://pipeline.loni.ucla.edu.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsSoftwareAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseBrain MappingComputational BiologyHumansInternetUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID20927408
PMCPMC2946935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.