Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20927376›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Ontology-based meta-analysis of global collections of high-throughput public data.

Ilya Kupershmidt, Qiaojuan Jane Su, Anoop Grewal, Suman Sundaresh, Inbal Halperin, James Flynn, Mamatha Shekar, Helen Wang, Jenny Park, Wenwu Cui and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 236 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
236citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

236 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. ToxCompl completion of the DrugMatrix toxicogenomics database: an integrated resource for hypothesis generation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hyper-maturity and accelerated aging in the hippocampus of mouse models of neuropsychiatric disorders with anxiety-like behavior.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dose-response modeling of effects in mice after exposure to a polyfluoroalkyl substance (Nafion byproduct 2).Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article

176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ilya KupershmidtNextBio, Cupertino, California, United States of America. ilya@nextbio.com
Qiaojuan Jane Su
Anoop Grewal
Suman Sundaresh
Inbal Halperin
James Flynn
Mamatha Shekar
Helen Wang
Jenny Park
Wenwu Cui
Gregory D Wall
Robert Wisotzkey
Satnam Alag
Saeid Akhtari
Mostafa Ronaghi

Funding

Cross-species meta-analysis tool for high-throughput genomic researchR43GM078602 · NIGMS · NEXTBIO · PI AKHTARI, SAEID · 2006 to 2006
$157k
NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM078602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe investigation of the interconnections between the molecular and genetic events that govern biological systems is essential if we are to understand the development of disease and design effective novel treatments. Microarray and next-generation sequencing technologies have the potential to provide this information. However, taking full advantage of these approaches requires that biological connections be made across large quantities of highly heterogeneous genomic datasets. Leveraging the increasingly huge quantities of genomic data in the public domain is fast becoming one of the key challenges in the research community today. METHODOLOGY/

resultsWe have developed a novel data mining framework that enables researchers to use this growing collection of public high-throughput data to investigate any set of genes or proteins. The connectivity between molecular states across thousands of heterogeneous datasets from microarrays and other genomic platforms is determined through a combination of rank-based enrichment statistics, meta-analyses, and biomedical ontologies. We address data quality concerns through dataset replication and meta-analysis and ensure that the majority of the findings are derived using multiple lines of evidence. As an example of our strategy and the utility of this framework, we apply our data mining approach to explore the biology of brown fat within the context of the thousands of publicly available gene expression datasets.

conclusionsOur work presents a practical strategy for organizing, mining, and correlating global collections of large-scale genomic data to explore normal and disease biology. Using a hypothesis-free approach, we demonstrate how a data-driven analysis across very large collections of genomic data can reveal novel discoveries and evidence to support existing hypothesis.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticData MiningAnimalsDatabase Management SystemsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMeta-Analysis as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20927376
PMCPMC2947508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.