Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20927354›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2010

Cost-effectiveness of pooled nucleic acid amplification testing for acute HIV infection after third-generation HIV antibody screening and rapid testing in the United States: a comparison of three public health settings.

Angela B Hutchinson, Pragna Patel, Stephanie L Sansom, Paul G Farnham, Timothy J Sullivan, Berry Bennett, Peter R Kerndt, Robert K Bolan, James D Heffelfinger, Vimalanand S Prabhu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Determination of Varying Group Sizes for Pooling Procedure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
  8. Evidence for optimal HIV screening and testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: A systematic review.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cost-Effectiveness of Frequent HIV Testing of High-Risk Populations in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Finding those at risk: acute HIV infection in Newark, NJ.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angela B HutchinsonDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. ash2@cdc.gov
Pragna Patel
Stephanie L Sansom
Paul G Farnham
Timothy J Sullivan
Berry Bennett
Peter R Kerndt
Robert K Bolan
James D Heffelfinger
Vimalanand S Prabhu
Bernard M Branson
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USLos Angeles County Department of Health Services · USLos Angeles LGBT Center · USNew York State Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of acute HIV infection (AHI) with pooled nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) following HIV testing is feasible. However, cost-effectiveness analyses to guide policy around AHI screening are lacking; particularly after more sensitive third-generation antibody screening and rapid testing. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of pooled NAAT screening that assessed the prevention benefits of identification and notification of persons with AHI and cases averted compared with repeat antibody testing at different intervals. Effectiveness data were derived from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention AHI study conducted in three settings: municipal sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, a community clinic serving a population of men who have sex with men, and HIV counseling and testing sites. Our analysis included a micro-costing study of NAAT and a mathematical model of HIV transmission. Cost-effectiveness ratios are reported as costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in US dollars from the societal perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key variables, including AHI positivity rates, antibody testing frequency, symptomatic detection of AHI, and costs. Pooled NAAT for AHI screening following annual antibody testing had cost-effectiveness ratios exceeding US$200,000 per QALY gained for the municipal STD clinics and HIV counseling and testing sites and was cost saving for the community clinic. Cost-effectiveness ratios increased substantially if the antibody testing interval decreased to every 6 months and decreased to cost-saving if the testing interval increased to every 5 years. NAAT was cost saving in the community clinic in all situations. Results were particularly sensitive to AHI screening yield.

conclusionsPooled NAAT screening for AHI following negative third-generation antibody or rapid tests is not cost-effective at recommended antibody testing intervals for high-risk persons except in very high-incidence settings.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisCost-Benefit AnalysisHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPublic HealthRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20927354
PMCPMC2946951
OpenAlexW2095950602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.