Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20926704›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients by microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay.

Dang Thi Minh Ha, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan, Vo Sy Kiet, Marcel Wolbers, Hoang Thi Thanh Hang, Jeremy Day, Nguyen Quang Hien, Nguyen Anh Tien, Pham Thuy An, Truong Thi Anh and 16 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Update on tuberculosis: TB in the early 21st century.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dang Thi Minh HaPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, and Wellcome Trust Mamor Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, 120 Hung Vuong, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. hadtm@oucru.org
Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan
Vo Sy Kiet
Marcel Wolbers
Hoang Thi Thanh Hang
Jeremy Day
Nguyen Quang Hien
Nguyen Anh Tien
Pham Thuy An
Truong Thi Anh
Do Thi Tuong Oanh
Chau Luong Hoa
Nguyen Thi Minh Chau
Nguyen Ngoc Hai
Ngo Thanh Binh
Le Hong Ngoc
Doan Thanh Phuong
Tran Van Quyet
Nguyen Thi Bich Tuyen
Vo Thi Ha
Nguyen Thi Nho
Dai Viet Hoa
Phan Thi Hoang Anh
Nguyen Huy Dung
Jeremy Farrar
Maxine Caws
Hospital for Tropical Diseases · VNOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay (MODS) is a novel and promising test for the early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the MODS assay for the early diagnosis of TB in HIV-positive patients presenting to Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in southern Vietnam. A total of 738 consecutive sputum samples collected from 307 HIV-positive individuals suspected of TB were tested by smear, MODS, and the mycobacteria growth indicator tube method (MGIT). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MODS compared to the microbiological gold standard (either smear or MGIT) were 87 and 93%, respectively. The sensitivities of smear, MODS, and MGIT were 57, 71, and 75%, respectively, against clinical gold standard (MODS versus smear, P<0.001; MODS versus MGIT, P=0.03). The clinical gold standard was defined as patients who had a clinical examination and treatment consistent with TB, with or without microbiological confirmation. For the diagnosis of smear-negative patients, the sensitivities of MODS and MGIT were 38 and 45%, respectively (P=0.08). The median times to detection using MODS and MGIT were 8 and 11 days, respectively, and they were 11 and 17 days, respectively, for smear-negative samples. The original bacterial/fungal contamination rate of MODS was 1.1%, while it was 2.6% for MGIT. The cross-contamination rate of MODS was 4.7%. In conclusion, MODS is a sensitive, specific, and rapid test that is appropriate for the detection of HIV-associated TB; its cost and ease of use make it particularly useful in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

AdultAntitubercular AgentsEarly DiagnosisFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyMycobacteriumSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosis, PulmonaryVietnamAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID20926704
PMCPMC3008451
OpenAlexW2159595688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.