Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20926615›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

The episodic nature of spike trains in the early visual pathway.

Daniel A Butts, Gaëlle Desbordes, Chong Weng, Jianzhong Jin, Jose-Manuel Alonso, Garrett B Stanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Feedforward Thalamocortical Connectivity Preserves Stimulus Timing Information in Sensory Pathways.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural Coding With Bursts-Current State and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel A ButtsDept. of Biology, 1210 Biology-Psychology Bldg. 144, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. dab@umd.edu
Gaëlle Desbordes
Chong Weng
Jianzhong Jin
Jose-Manuel Alonso
Garrett B Stanley

Funding

STUDIES OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY005253 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI ALONSO, JOSE MANUEL · 1985 to 2025
$9.6M
VISUAL SYSTEMR37EY005253 · NEI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI WIESEL, TORSTEN N. · 1986 to 1996
–
NEI NIH HHS EY-005253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An understanding of the neural code in a given visual area is often confounded by the immense complexity of visual stimuli combined with the number of possible meaningful patterns that comprise the response spike train. In the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), visual stimulation generates spike trains comprised of short spiking episodes ("events") separated by relatively long intervals of silence, which establishes a basis for in-depth analysis of the neural code. By studying this event structure in both artificial and natural visual stimulus contexts and at different contrasts, we are able to describe the dependence of event structure on stimulus class and discern which aspects generalize. We find that the event structure on coarse time scales is robust across stimulus and contrast and can be explained by receptive field processing. However, the relationship between the stimulus and fine-time-scale features of events is less straightforward, partially due to a significant amount of trial-to-trial variability. A new measure called "label information" identifies structural elements of events that can contain ≤30% more information in the context of natural movies compared with what is available from the overall event timing. The first interspike interval of an event most robustly conveys additional information about the stimulus and is somewhat more informative than the event spike count and much more informative than the presence of bursts. Nearly every event is preserved across contrast despite changes in their fine-time-scale features, suggesting that--at least on a coarse level--the stimulus selectivity of LGN neurons is contrast invariant. Event-based analysis thus casts previously studied elements of LGN coding such as contrast adaptation and receptive field processing in a new light and leads to broad conclusions about the composition of the LGN neuronal code.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCatsGeniculate BodiesModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPhotic StimulationTime FactorsVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID20926615
PMCPMC3007659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.