Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20926608›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Differing neurophysiologic mechanosensory input from glabrous and hairy skin in juvenile rats.

M Danilo Boada, Timothy T Houle, James C Eisenach, Douglas G Ririe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CaMKII Controls Whether Touch Is Painful.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Developmental differences in peripheral glabrous skin mechanosensory nerve receptive field and intracellular electrophysiologic properties: phenotypic characterization in infant and juvenile rats.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Danilo BoadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009, USA. dboada@wfubmc.edu
Timothy T Houle
James C Eisenach
Douglas G Ririe
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF SELECTIVE SPINAL ANALGESIA IN HUMANSR01GM048085 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 1992 to 2010
$4.1M
Receptor Selective Spinal AnalgesiaR37GM048085 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory afferents in skin encode and convey thermal and mechanical conditions, including those that threaten tissue damage. A small proportion of skin, the glabrous skin of the distal extremities, is specialized to explore the environment in fine detail. Aside from increased innervation density, little is known regarding properties of mechanosensory afferents to glabrous skin in younger animals that explain the exquisite precision and high contrast in rapidly sampling physical structures, including those that threaten injury. To assess this, we obtained intact neuronal intracellular recordings in vivo from 115 mechanosensitive afferent neurons from lumbar and thoracic dorsal root ganglia in juvenile rats. Two characteristics were unique to glabrous skin: a threefold higher proportion of fast-conducting to slow-conducting afferents that were high-threshold mechanosensitive nociceptors compared with hairy skin and a twofold faster conduction velocity of fast-conducting nociceptors compared with hairy skin. Additionally differences were found in mechanical thresholds between glabrous skin and hairy skin for each fiber type. These differences reflect and help explain the rapid response of skin specialized to explore the physical environment. Additionally, these results highlight potential limitations of using passive electrical properties and conduction velocity alone to characterize primary afferents without knowledge of the skin type they innervated.

Indexed as

AnimalsGanglia, SpinalHairMaleMechanoreceptorsMechanotransduction, CellularNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNeural ConductionNeurons, AfferentNociceptorsPain ThresholdRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySkinTouch

Identifiers

PMID20926608
PMCPMC3007645
OpenAlexW1965223467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.