ArticleNeurosurgical review2010
Childhood pineal parenchymal tumors: clinical and therapeutic aspects.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sleep and Rhythmic Profile After Pineal Gland Removal in Humans.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Pineal Gland Parenchyma Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Pineal region tumors: a simplified management scheme.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation of the clinical characteristic of pineal parenchymal tumors in children and adolescent with histopathological diagnosis and patient survival. Records of 27 patients with histologically diagnosed pineocytomas (n=16) and pineoblastoma (n=11) consecutively treated between 1991 and 2001 were reviewed retrospectively to identify factors predictive of aggressiveness. Among analyzed epidemiological, clinical, and radiological factors, we found that independent prognostic indicator in patients with childhood pineal parenchymal tumor was the extent of surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.