Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20924664›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2010

Body size and the risk of ovarian cancer by hormone therapy use in the California Teachers Study cohort.

Alison J Canchola, Ellen T Chang, Leslie Bernstein, Joan A Largent, Peggy Reynolds, Dennis Deapen, Katherine D Henderson, Giske Ursin, Pamela L Horn-Ross

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review.Cancer biology & medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Inflammatory Markers and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Tumor Subtypes: The EPIC Cohort.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison J CancholaCancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Avenue, Suite 300, Fremont, CA 94538, USA. Alison.Canchola@CPIC.org
Ellen T Chang
Leslie Bernstein
Joan A Largent
Peggy Reynolds
Dennis Deapen
Katherine D Henderson
Giske Ursin
Pamela L Horn-Ross
Cancer Prevention Institute of California · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

CALIFORNIA TEACHERS STUDYR01CA077398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERNSTEIN, LESLIE · 1998 to 2014
$29.7M
NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35136NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077398NCI NIH HHS R01 CA77398PHS HHS U55/CCR921930-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether obesity and hormone therapy (HT) are associated with ovarian cancer risk among women in the California Teachers Study cohort.

methodsOf 56,091 women age ≥ 45 years, 277 developed epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2007. Multivariate Cox regression was performed.

resultsAmong women who never used HT, greater adult weight gain, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio, but not adult BMI, increased risk of ovarian cancer. Compared to women who never used HT and had a stable adult weight, risk of ovarian cancer was increased in women who gained ≥ 40 lb (relative risk (RR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.0) or used HT for >5 years (RR 2.3 95% CI: 1.3-4.1). Having both exposures (RR 1.9, 95% CI: 0.99-3.5), however, did not increase risk more than having either alone. Results were similar for waist circumference and weight-to-height ratio; however, differences across HT groups were not statistically significant.

conclusionsThis study suggests that abdominal adiposity and weight gain, but not overall obesity, increase ovarian cancer risk and that there may be a threshold level beyond which additional hormones, whether exogenous or endogenous, do not result in additional elevation in risk. However, large pooled analyses are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexBody SizeCaliforniaCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCohort StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyFacultyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialObesityOvarian NeoplasmsPostmenopause

Identifiers

PMID20924664
PMCPMC3120052
OpenAlexW2014211933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.