Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20924553›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2010

[Imaging of molecular structures of breasts with new sonography techniques].

M Reisegger, G Schueller, R Gruber, K Pinker, C Riedl, T H Helbich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ReiseggerAbteilung für Allgemeine Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Division für Molekulare und Gender-Bildgebung, Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Österreich.
G Schueller
R Gruber
K Pinker
C Riedl
T H Helbich
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sonography has become one of the most important imaging methods in breast diagnostics. Through the development of high-frequency transducers and the use of ultrasound contrast agents, the number of indications for sonography of the breast has continued to increase in recent years. Visualization of very small vessels under 100 µm enables sensitive detection and quantification of tissue perfusion. Thus, breast ultrasound can play an essential role in answering questions about certain pathologies. Further technical advances, such as automated breast ultrasound systems, provide an essential step for standardization of investigations. Targeted ultrasound is a new important development of this technique. Specific markers which are conjugated with the surface of contrast medium microspheres allow targeted molecular endothelial structures to be selectively visualized and quantified. These developments will strengthen the role of sonography in the future as a non-invasive and easy to use method.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFibroblast Growth FactorsHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeovascularization, PathologicPhospholipidsPolysaccharidesBiomarkers, Tumorcontrast agent BR1Contrast MediaFibroblast Growth FactorsPhospholipidsPolysaccharidesSHU 508Sulfur HexafluorideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID20924553
OpenAlexW183177414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.