Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20924194›Full record

ArticleHuman heredity2010

Systematic removal of outliers to reduce heterogeneity in case-control association studies.

Yuanyuan Shen, Zhe Liu, Jurg Ott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuanyuan ShenBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhe Liu
Jurg Ott

Funding

Genetic Modifiers for 22q 11.2 Deletion SyndromeR01HL084410 · NHLBI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MORROW, BERNICE E · 2007 to 2010
$3.3M
Genetic Associations with Alzheimer-free SurvivalR01AG026916 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAMER, PATRICIA L · 2005 to 2008
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL084410NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084410NIA NIH HHS AG026916NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIn human case-control association studies, population heterogeneity is often present and can lead to increased false-positive results. Various methods have been proposed and are in current use to remedy this situation.

methodsWe assume that heterogeneity is due to a relatively small number of individuals whose allele frequencies differ from those of the remainder of the sample. For this situation, we propose a new method of handling heterogeneity by removing outliers in a controlled manner. In a coordinate system of the c largest principal components in multidimensional scaling (MDS), we systematically remove one after another of the most extreme outlying individuals and each time recompute the largest association test statistic. The smallest p value obtained within M removals serves as our test statistic whose significance level is assessed in randomization samples.

resultsIn power simulations of our method and three methods in current use, averaged over several different scenarios, the best method turned out to be logistic regression analysis (based on all individuals) with MDS components as covariates.

conclusionOur proposed method ranked closely behind logistic regression analysis with MDS components but ahead of other commonly used approaches. In analyses of real datasets our method performed best.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalSelection BiasGene FrequencyHumansParkinson DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulationRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20924194
PMCPMC2975732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.