Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20923841›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial.

Elizabeth Dormandy, Martin Gulliford, Stirling Bryan, Tracy E Roberts, Michael Calnan, Karl Atkin, Jonathan Karnon, Jane Logan, Fred Kavalier, Hilary J Harris and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia in primary care: a cost-effectiveness study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Trial
  5. Burden of sickle cell disease among pregnant women in central India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Preferences for prenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell disorder: A discrete choice experiment comparing potential service users and health-care providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  11. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Commissioning maternity care: little room for manoeuvre?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  16. Jumping (or being pushed) from maternity care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Elizabeth DormandyKing's College London, Psychology Department (at Guy's), London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Martin Gulliford
Stirling Bryan
Tracy E Roberts
Michael Calnan
Karl Atkin
Jonathan Karnon
Jane Logan
Fred Kavalier
Hilary J Harris
Tracey A Johnston
Elizabeth N Anionwu
Vicki Tsianakas
Patricia Jones
Theresa M Marteau
King's College London · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBJoseph Rowntree Foundation · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of West London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 03/02/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care as a way of facilitating earlier uptake of screening.

designPartial factorial cluster randomised controlled trial.

setting25 UK general practices from deprived inner city areas.

participantsAnonymised data on all pregnant women attending participating practices during a six month period before randomisation and a seven month period after randomisation. This included 1708 eligible women.

interventionPractices were randomised to three groups for seven months: parallel testing in general practice (tests for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia offered to both parents when pregnancy was first reported); sequential testing in general practice (tests offered to mothers when pregnancy was first reported, and subsequently to the partners of women who were found to be carriers); and midwife care (tests offered to mothers at first consultation with a midwife).

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome (available for all women) was the proportion of eligible women screened before 10 weeks' (70 days') gestation. Secondary outcomes were an offer of screening to women before 10 weeks' gestation, gestational age at testing, mean interval from first visit to the general practice visit to screening, and women's knowledge of the carrier status of their baby's father before 77 days' (11 weeks') gestation. The study was designed to detect a 20% absolute increase in screening uptake. Cluster level analyses were adjusted for age group, parity, ethnic group, primary care organisation, and number of general practitioners per practice.

resultsData were analysed for 1708 eligible women. In the midwife care arm, 2% (9/441) of women were screened before 10 weeks' gestation compared with 24% (161/677) in the GP parallel testing arm and 28% (167/590) in the GP sequential testing arm. The estimated adjusted difference between the midwife care and GP parallel testing arms was 16.5% (95% confidence interval 7.1% to 25.8%; P=0.002) and between the midwife care and GP sequential testing arms was 27.8% (14.8% to 40.7%; P<0.001). By 26 weeks' gestation the proportion of women screened across the three trial arms was similar (81%). The proportion of women who knew the carrier status of the baby's father by 11 weeks' gestation was 0% (0/441) in the midwife care arm, 2% (13/677) in the GP parallel testing arm (P=0.003), and 1% (3/590) in the GP sequential testing arm (P=0.374).

conclusionOffering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia as part of consultations for pregnancy confirmation in primary care increases the proportion of women screened before 10 weeks' gestation. Even with intervention, however, only a minority of women were screened before 10 weeks. Additional interventions should be considered to achieve testing early in pregnancy for most women wanting such tests so that couples with affected pregnancies have less time pressure to choose options, which may include termination of the pregnancy.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN00677850.

Indexed as

AdultAnemia, Sickle CellCluster AnalysisEarly DiagnosisFamily PracticeFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningHumansMaleMidwiferyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, SecondPrenatal DiagnosisThalassemia

Identifiers

PMID20923841
PMCPMC2950261
OpenAlexW2029506470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.