Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20923620›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2010

Past and present progress in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia.

John M Kane, Christoph U Correll

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Cariprazine in the treatment of schizophrenia: a proof-of-concept trial.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2016
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M KaneZucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA. psychiatry@lij.edu
Christoph U Correll

Funding

Trials Operation UnitP30MH074543 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI KANE, JOHN M · 2005 to 2009
$8.1M
Trials Operation Unit (OPERATIONS CORE)P30MH090590 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI CORRELL, CHRISTOPH U · 2010 to 2014
$7.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH074543-01NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH074543NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite treatment advances over the past decades, schizophrenia remains one of the most severe psychiatric disorders that is associated with a chronic relapsing course and marked functional impairment in a substantial proportion of patients. In this article, a historical overview of the pharmacologic advances in the treatment of schizophrenia over the past 50 years is presented. This is followed by a review of the current developments in optimizing the treatment and outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Methodological challenges, potential solutions, and areas of particular need for further research are highlighted. Although treatment goals of response, remission, and recovery have been defined more uniformly, a good "effectiveness" measure mapping onto functional outcomes is still lacking. Moreover, the field must advance in transferring measurement-based approaches from research to clinical practice. There is an ongoing debate regarding whether and which first- or second-generation antipsychotics should be used. However, especially when considering individual adverse effect profiles, the differentiation into first- and second-generation antipsychotics as unified classes cannot be upheld, and a more differentiated view and treatment selection are required. The desired, individualized treatment approach needs to consider current symptoms, comorbid conditions, past therapeutic response, and adverse effects, as well as patient choice and expectations. Acute and long-term goals and effects of medication treatment should be balanced. To date, clozapine is the only evidence-based treatment for refractory patients, and the role of antipsychotic polypharmacy and other augmentation strategies remains unclear, at best. To discover novel treatments with enhanced/broader efficacy and improved tolerability, and to enable personalized treatment, the mechanisms underlying illness development and progression, symptomatic improvement, and side effect development need to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAntipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazineClozapineControlled Clinical Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug MonitoringDrug Therapy, CombinationDyskinesia, Drug-InducedEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLong-Term CareMetabolic Clearance RateParkinsonian DisordersPrecision MedicinePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAntipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazineClozapine

Identifiers

PMID20923620
PMCPMC3065240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.