ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2011
Telemedicine or telephone consultation in patients with acute stroke.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Pooled it
- Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2012Trial
- Will the Doctor "See" You Now? The Development and Implementation of a Targeted Telemedicine System for Primary Care.ACI open · 2023Article
- Synchronous neurology-primary care collaboration in a medical home.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2020Article
- Other Hospital-onset Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy after Inter-hospital Transfer.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2020Article
- Article
- Telemedicine as a tool to bring clinical ethics expertise to remote locations.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2015Article
- A qualitative description of telemedicine for acute stroke care in Norway: technology is not the issue.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Article
- Future neurohospitalist: teleneurohospitalist.The Neurohospitalist · 2012Article
- Burden of cirrhosis on older Americans and their families: analysis of the health and retirement study.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advantages of telephone consultations for patients with acute stroke syndromes are history of use, simplicity, availability, portability, short consultation time, and facile implementation. The favorable aspects of telemedicine consultations are high accuracy, reliability, efficacy, and effectiveness, the growing technological sophistication of the offerings and features, and the high grade of recommendation. Between the two modalities, telemedicine is optimal for assessing patients with acute stroke and superior to telephone-only evaluations. Telephone consultations can serve as an adequate ancillary, adjunctive, supplemental, or back-up modality for a telestroke network. With recent advances in one-way/two-way video and teleradiology features adapted to Smartphones, the dividing line between "telephone" and "telemedicine" consultations for acute stroke is indistinct. Telestroke providers prefer a figurative "tool belt" of technologies available to adapt to individual consultation requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.