ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2010
Roles of the α1A-adrenergic receptor carboxyl tail in protein kinase C-induced phosphorylation and desensitization.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updates in the function and regulation of αBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019Review
- Neurovascular mechanisms underlying augmented cold-induced reflex cutaneous vasoconstriction in human hypertension.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Novel Structural Approaches to Study GPCR Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- Impaired increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity contribute to age-related decrements in reflex cutaneous vasoconstriction.The Journal of physiology · 2015Article
- Lack of limb or sex differences in the cutaneous vascular responses to exogenous norepinephrine.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noradrenaline- and tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA)-induced phosphorylation and functional desensitization of the following receptors were studied: (1) wild-type bovine α(1A)- and hamster α(1B)-adrenergic receptors (ARs), (2) chimeric ARs in which the carboxyl terminus tails were exchanged (α(1AB)- and α(1BA)-ARs), and (3) carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-ARs fussed to enhanced green fluorescent protein. Noradrenaline and TPA pronouncedly increased α(1B)-AR phosphorylation while TPA markedly desensitized these receptors. In contrast, TPA-induced desensitization and TPA- and noradrenaline-induced phosphorylation of α(1A)-ARs were clearly of lesser magnitude. Chimeric ARs with exchanged carboxyl terminus tails showed that the extent of phosphorylation reflected the carboxyl domain rather than the receptor core. Surprisingly, there was no correlation between phosphorylation and functional desensitization, i.e., activation of protein kinase C clearly desensitized both chimeric receptors to a similar extent. Interestingly, TPA and noradrenaline increased carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-AR phosphorylation and TPA also induced receptor desensitization. We were unable to detect carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-AR internalization after 5-min stimulations with noradrenaline or TPA. Our results suggest the following: (a) the α(1A)-AR carboxyl terminus tail was not essential for signaling or desensitization; (b) carboxyl terminus tail exchange "transplanted" the phosphorylation pattern of the receptors, but the functional consequences of such a transplant were very limited; (c) α(1A)-AR desensitization was not associated to receptor internalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.