Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20922345›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2010

Clinic visits and prescribing patterns among Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System dementia patients.

G B Rattinger, C D Mullins, I H Zuckerman, E Onukwugha, S Delisle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing Alzheimer's research: A review of big data promises.International journal of medical informatics · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Racial/ethnic disparities in initiation and persistent use of anti-dementia medications.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health economics and health policy issues in Alzheimer's disease.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G B RattingerPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C D Mullins
I H Zuckerman
E Onukwugha
S Delisle
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USVA Maryland Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to determine how patient demographics and outpatient referrals to specialized dementia (DEM) or mental health (MH) clinics influence receipt of anti-dementia (AD), antidepressant (ADEP), antipsychotic (APSY) and sedative-hypnotic (SEDH) medications among veterans with dementia.

designRetrospective, cross-sectional observational study.

settingVeterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS).

participantsVeterans aged ≥ 60 years with Alzheimer's or related dementia diagnosis after 1999 with minimum of one-year follow-up or death were included. MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective analysis of VAMHCS electronic medical records were used to determine predictors of AD, ADEP, APSY, and SEDH prescribing using logistic regression models that examined visits to DEM or MH clinics, patient age, follow-up time, race/ethnicity and marital status.

resultsAmong 1209 veterans with average follow-up of 3.2 (SD 1.9) years, 36% percent had MH visits, 38% had DEM visits and 19% visited both clinics. DEM visits were associated with AD and ADEP but not APSY medication receipt (OR(AD:DEM) = 1.47, 95% CI = (1.052, 2.051); OR(ADEP:DEM) = 1.66, 95% CI = (1.193, 2.302); OR(APSY:DEM) = 1.35, 95% CI = (0.941, 1.929)). MH visit was associated with ADEP and APSY medication receipt (OR(AD:MH)\ = 1.16, 95% CI = (0.821, 1.631); OR(ADEP:MH) = 2.83, 95% CI = (2.005, 4.005); OR (APSY:MH) = 4.41, 95% CI = (3.109, 6.255)).

conclusionIn the VAMHCS dementia population, visits to DEM or MH specialty clinics increase the odds of receiving AD, ADEP, and APSY medications.

Indexed as

VeteransAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmbulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDrug UtilizationElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMarylandMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID20922345
PMCPMC12880278
OpenAlexW1992560241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.