Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20921520›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2010

Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes.

Catherine Zhu, Ellen Hsu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. JMolecular immunology · 2018
    Article
  7. Assembly and Expression of Shark Ig Genes.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2016
    Review
  8. Biased Immunoglobulin Light Chain Gene Usage in the Shark.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The multiple shark Ig H chain genes rearrange and hypermutate autonomously.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine ZhuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York, Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY 11203-2098, USA.
Ellen Hsu
State University of New York · US

Funding

Isotype Exclusion and Hypermutation in the Nurse SharkR01GM068095 · NIGMS · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI HSU, ELLEN · 2004 to 2017
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068095NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM068095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharks are representatives of the earliest vertebrates that possess an immune system utilizing V(D)J recombination to generate Ag receptors. Their Ab repertoire diversity is based in part on a somatic hypermutation process that introduces adjacent nucleotide substitutions of 2-5 bp. We have isolated mutant nonfunctional Ig rearrangements and intronic flank sequences to characterize the nonselected, intrinsic properties of this phenomenon; changes unique to shark were observed. Duplications and deletions were associated with N additions, suggesting participation of a DNA polymerase with some degree of template independence during the repair of DNA breaks initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase. Other mutations were consistent with some in vitro activities of mammalian translesion DNA polymerase η: tandem base substitutions, strand slippage, and small insertions/deletions. The nature of substitution patterns shows that DNA lesions at shark Ig genes recruit DNA repair factors with a species-specific repertoire of activities. We speculate that the tandem mutations are introduced by direct sequential misinsertions and that, in shark B cells, the mispairs tend to be extended rather than proofread. Despite extensive changes undergone by some mutants, the physical range of mutational activity remained restricted to VDJ and within the first 2-kb portion of the 6.8-kb J-C intron, perhaps a self-regulating aspect of activation-induced cytidine deaminase action that is conserved in evolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceB-LymphocytesDNA RepairGenes, ImmunoglobulinMolecular Sequence DataMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionSharksSomatic Hypermutation, Immunoglobulin

Identifiers

PMID20921520
PMCPMC2959145
OpenAlexW2161831419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.