Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20921048›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

How far details are important in ecosystem modelling: the case of multi-limiting nutrients in phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions.

J-C Poggiale, M Baklouti, B Queguiner, S A L M Kooijman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nutrient colimitation is a quantitative, dynamic property of microbial populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards a simplification of models using regression trees.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic energy budget theory restores coherence in biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  9. Dynamic energy budget theory and population ecology: lessons from Daphnia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  10. Stylized facts in microalgal growth: interpretation in a dynamic energy budget context.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  11. Modelling the ecological niche from functional traits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  12. Subcellular metabolic organization in the context of dynamic energy budget and biochemical systems theories.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J-C PoggialeLaboratoire de Microbiologie, de Géochimie et d'Ecologie Marines (UMR CNRS 6117), Marseille Cedex, France. jean-christophe.poggiale@univmed.fr
M Baklouti
B Queguiner
S A L M Kooijman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We try to answer the question of to what extent details in nutrient uptake and phytoplankton physiology matter for population and community dynamics. To this end, we study how two nutrients interact in limiting phytoplankton growth. A popular formulation uses a product-rule for nutrient uptake, which we compare with that on the basis of synthesizing units. We first fit different nutrient uptake models to a dataset and conclude that the quantitative differences between the models are small. Then we study the sensitivity of phytoplankton growth and zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions (ZPi) models to uptake formulations. Two population models are compared; they are based on different assumptions on the relation between nutrient uptake and phytoplankton growth. We find that the population and community models are sensitive to uptake formulations. According to the uptake formulation used in the ZPi models, qualitative differences can be observed. Indeed, although two models based on functions with similar shapes have close equilibria, these can differ in stability properties. Since stability involves the derivatives of formulas, even if two formulas provide close values, large numerical differences in the stability criterion may occur after derivation. We conclude that mechanistic details can be of importance for community modelling.

Indexed as

EcosystemFoodModels, BiologicalAnimalsBioreactorsKineticsPhytoplanktonZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID20921048
PMCPMC2981976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.