ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2010
Understanding FDA regulation of DTC genetic tests within the context of administrative law.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel strategy of multiple-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis for genetic fingerprinting of human.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- The Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Protections for Mobile Health Apps.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
- Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a comprehensive view.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2013Article
- Recent developments in health care law: culture and controversy.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2013Article
- Field of genes: an investigation of sports-related genetic testing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2012Article
- Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- Communication about DTC testing: commentary on a 'family experience of personal genomics'.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?Human genetics · 2011Article
- Counterpoint: Do not opine before it's time.Nature biotechnology · 2011Article
- Point: Are we prepared for the future doctor visit?Nature biotechnology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How the FDA should regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests is fiercely contested. Passing a rule or issuing an order is only one down in the series. There is more to the regulatory game.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.