Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20920540›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2010

Mesenchymal stem cells for the sustained in vivo delivery of bioactive factors.

Todd Meyerrose, Scott Olson, Suzanne Pontow, Stefanos Kalomoiris, Yunjoon Jung, Geralyn Annett, Gerhard Bauer, Jan A Nolta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AnFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd MeyerroseDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, 95817, USA.
Scott Olson
Suzanne Pontow
Stefanos Kalomoiris
Yunjoon Jung
Geralyn Annett
Gerhard Bauer
Jan A Nolta
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Immunodeficient Mouse Model of Stem Cell PlasticityR01DK061848 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NOLTA, JAN A. · 2001 to 2009
$2.7M
Direct cell to cell transfer of microRNA for tissue repairR01GM099688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI NOLTA, JAN A. · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Functional dissection of human A-MSC vs BM-MSC phenotypeR01HL073256 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NOLTA, JAN A. · 2003 to 2010
$2.3M
EX VIVO STEM CELL MANIPULATION AND HUMAN HEMATOPOIESISR01DK053041 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NOLTA, JAN A. · 1998 to 2006
$1.6M
Shared LSRII Cytometer Equipment Application - UC Davis Stem Cell ProgramS10RR026825 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI NOLTA, JAN A. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026825NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073256NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL073256NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01DK53041NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01DK61848NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053041NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK061848NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are a promising tool for cell therapy, either through direct contribution to the repair of bone, tendon and cartilage or as an adjunct therapy through protein production and immune mediation. They are an attractive vehicle for cellular therapies due to a variety of cell intrinsic and environmentally responsive properties. Following transplantation, MSC are capable of systemic migration, are not prone to tumor formation, and appear to tolerize the immune response across donor mismatch. These attributes combine to allow MSC to reside in many different tissue types without disrupting the local microenvironment and, in some cases, responding to the local environment with appropriate protein secretion. We describe work done by our group and others in using human MSC for the sustained in vivo production of supraphysiological levels of cytokines for the support of cotransplanted hematopoietic stem cells and enzymes that are deficient in animal models of lysosomal storage disorders such as MPSVII. In addition, the use of MSC engineered to secrete protein products has been reviewed in several fields of tissue injury repair, including but not limited to revascularization after myocardial infarction, regeneration of intervertebral disc defects and spine therapy, repair of stroke, therapy for epilepsy, skeletal tissue repair, chondrogenesis/knee and joint repair, and neurodegenerative diseases. Genetically engineered MSC have thus proven safe and efficacious in numerous animal models of disease modification and tissue repair and are poised to be tested in human clinical trials. The potential for these interesting cells to secrete endogenous or transgene products in a sustained and long-term manner is highly promising and is discussed in the current review.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsGenetic EngineeringMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicCytokinesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunologic FactorsMucopolysaccharidosis VIIRegenerationCytokinesImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20920540
PMCPMC3815452
OpenAlexW2014969441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.