Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20920211›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2010

Whole genome sequencing of enriched chloroplast DNA using the Illumina GAII platform.

Robin A Atherton, Bennet J McComish, Lara D Shepherd, Lorraine A Berry, Nick W Albert, Peter J Lockhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The complete plastome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  4. Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants:Molecular biology research communications · 2023
    Article
  5. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Analysis of two Sugarcane AncestorsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-wide comparative analysis of four Indian Drosophila species.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robin A Atherton *Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Bennet J McComish *Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Lara D ShepherdInstitute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Lorraine A BerryMassey Genome Service, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Nick W AlbertInstitute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Peter J LockhartInstitute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplete chloroplast genome sequences provide a valuable source of molecular markers for studies in molecular ecology and evolution of plants. To obtain complete genome sequences, recent studies have made use of the polymerase chain reaction to amplify overlapping fragments from conserved gene loci. However, this approach is time consuming and can be more difficult to implement where gene organisation differs among plants. An alternative approach is to first isolate chloroplasts and then use the capacity of high-throughput sequencing to obtain complete genome sequences. We report our findings from studies of the latter approach, which used a simple chloroplast isolation procedure, multiply-primed rolling circle amplification of chloroplast DNA, Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing, and de novo assembly of paired-end sequence reads.

resultsA modified rapid chloroplast isolation protocol was used to obtain plant DNA that was enriched for chloroplast DNA, but nevertheless contained nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Multiply-primed rolling circle amplification of this mixed template produced sufficient quantities of chloroplast DNA, even when the amount of starting material was small, and improved the template quality for Illumina Genome Analyzer II (hereafter Illumina GAII) sequencing. We demonstrate, using independent samples of karaka (Corynocarpus laevigatus), that there is high fidelity in the sequence obtained from this template. Although less than 20% of our sequenced reads could be mapped to chloroplast genome, it was relatively easy to assemble complete chloroplast genome sequences from the mixture of nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast reads.

conclusionsWe report successful whole genome sequencing of chloroplast DNA from karaka, obtained efficiently and with high fidelity.

Identifiers

PMID20920211
PMCPMC2956718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.