Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20919829›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2010

Why target PIM1 for cancer diagnosis and treatment?

Nancy S Magnuson, Zeping Wang, Gang Ding, Raymond Reeves

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oncology letters · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy S MagnusonSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–7520, USA.
Zeping Wang
Gang Ding
Raymond Reeves
Washington State University · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Contribution of Pim-1 kinase to cell surivalR01CA104470 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGNUSON, NANCY S · 2003 to 2007
$1.2M
Role of HMGA1 proteins in DNA damage and excision repairR01GM071760 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, RAYMOND · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104470NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly conserved proto-oncogenic protein PIM1 is an unusual serine or threonine kinase, in part because it is constitutively active. Overexpression of PIM1 experimentally leads to tumor formation in mice, while complete knockout of the protein has no observable phenotype. It appears to contribute to cancer development in three major ways when it is overexpressed; by inhibiting apoptosis, by promoting cell proliferation and by promoting genomic instability. Expression in normal tissues is nearly undetectable. However, in hematopoietic malignancies and in a variety of solid tumors, increased PIM1 expression has been shown to correlate with the stage of disease. This characteristic suggests it can serve as a useful biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Several specific and potent inhibitors of PIM1’s kinase activity have also been shown to induce apoptotic death of cancer cells, to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and to synergize with other anti-tumor agents, thus making it an attractive therapeutic target.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansMiceNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1

Identifiers

PMID20919829
PMCPMC3057053
OpenAlexW2142751122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.