ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2010
Preparing the patient for immunosuppressive therapy.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A guide to prepare patients with inflammatory bowel diseases for anti-TNF-α therapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Review
- Preparing for biologic or immunosuppressant therapy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2011Article
- [Monitoring treatment with biologics in non-infectious uveitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decision to start immunosuppressive therapy comes with benefits and risks. Patient selection is as important as medication selection, because some patients are not appropriate for certain therapies. The decision is based on many factors, including diagnosis, level of disease activity, comorbidities, and sometimes socioeconomic status. Frank discussion about side effects, possible adverse events (different from side effects), and monitoring protocols needs to occur after the clinician has decided on a therapy. Some therapies require additional screening prior to initiation (eg, tuberculosis testing before initiating biologics). Steroids are aggressive treatment, but need to have an end point. Thiopurines need to be monitored routinely with blood tests, and are associated with short-term side effects that can lead to discontinuation in about 20% of patients. Methotrexate is perhaps underused by community practitioners despite an adequate evidence base for its use for active inflammatory disease. Methotrexate may also be helpful in patients with arthralgias, but must be monitored. Biologics now target two molecules (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α and TNF-α4 integrins). However, because anti-adhesion molecule therapy is associated with a lethal central nervous system infection estimated to occur in 1 of 1,000 patients, this approach tends to be used as a third- or fourth-line therapy. Anti-TNFs are used for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with good results; however, immune reactions, infections, and neoplasms have resulted from their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.