ArticleScience and engineering ethics2010
Sharing data is a shared responsibility: Commentary on: "The essential nature of sharing in science".
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Public availability of research data in dentistry journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Article
- When data sharing gets close to 100%: what human paleogenetics can teach the open science movement.PloS one · 2015Article
- Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation.PloS one · 2012Article
- Issues in data management.Science and engineering ethics · 2010Article
- Editors' overview: topics in the responsible management of research data.Science and engineering ethics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research data should be made readily available. A robust data-sharing plan, led by the principal investigator of the research project, requires considerable administrative and operational resources. Because external support for data sharing is minimal, principal investigators should consider engaging existing institutional information experts, such as librarians and information systems personnel, to participate in data-sharing efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20890675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.