Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20890595›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2010

Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.

Laurie S Stevison, Mohamed A F Noor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hybrid dysgenesis inMobile DNA · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recombination rate plasticity: revealing mechanisms by design.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurie S StevisonDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708-0338, USA. lss6@duke.edu
Mohamed A F Noor

Funding

Fine-scale recombination, variation, divergence, and codon bias in DrosophilaR01GM086445 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLIMAN, RICHARD M, NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Genetics of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscuraR01GM076051 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS GM086445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination is fundamental to meiosis in many species and generates variation on which natural selection can act, yet fine-scale linkage maps are cumbersome to construct. We generated a fine-scale map of recombination rates across two major chromosomes in Drosophila persimilis using 181 SNP markers spanning two of five major chromosome arms. Using this map, we report significant fine-scale heterogeneity of local recombination rates. However, we also observed "recombinational neighborhoods," where adjacent intervals had similar recombination rates after excluding regions near the centromere and telomere. We further found significant positive associations of fine-scale recombination rate with repetitive element abundance and a 13-bp sequence motif known to associate with human recombination rates. We noted strong crossover interference extending 5-7 Mb from the initial crossover event. Further, we observed that fine-scale recombination rates in D. persimilis are strongly correlated with those obtained from a comparable study of its sister species, D. pseudoobscura. We documented a significant relationship between recombination rates and intron nucleotide sequence diversity within species, but no relationship between recombination rate and intron divergence between species. These results are consistent with selection models (hitchhiking and background selection) rather than mutagenic recombination models for explaining the relationship of recombination with nucleotide diversity within species. Finally, we found significant correlations between recombination rate and GC content, supporting both GC-biased gene conversion (BGC) models and selection-driven codon bias models. Overall, this genome-enabled map of fine-scale recombination rates allowed us to confirm findings of broader-scale studies and identify multiple novel features that merit further investigation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsChromosomes, InsectCodonCrossing Over, GeneticDrosophilaGene ConversionHumansIntronsNucleotidesRegression AnalysisRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityCodonNucleotides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.