Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20890269›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2010

DNA recognition and the precleavage state during single-stranded DNA transposition in D. radiodurans.

Alison Burgess Hickman, Jeffrey A James, Orsolya Barabas, Cécile Pasternak, Bao Ton-Hoang, Michael Chandler, Suzanne Sommer, Fred Dyda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mutational scanning of TnpB reveals latent activity for genome editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Replitrons: A major group of eukaryotic transposons encoding HUH endonuclease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison Burgess HickmanLaboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jeffrey A James
Orsolya Barabas
Cécile Pasternak
Bao Ton-Hoang
Michael Chandler
Suzanne Sommer
Fred Dyda
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversité Paris-Sud · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires · FR

Funding

Structure and function of novel prokaryotic DNA transposasesZIADK036154 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI DYDA, FREDERICK · 2009 to 2023
$7.7M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial insertion sequences (ISs) from the IS200/IS605 family encode the smallest known DNA transposases and mobilize through single-stranded DNA transposition. Transposition by one particular family member, ISDra2 from Deinococcus radiodurans, is dramatically stimulated upon massive γ irradiation. We have determined the crystal structures of four ISDra2 transposase/IS end complexes; combined with in vivo activity assays and fluorescence anisotropy binding measurements, these have revealed the molecular basis of strand discrimination and transposase action. The structures also show that previously established structural rules of target site recognition that allow different specific sequences to be targeted are only partially conserved among family members. Furthermore, we have captured a fully assembled active site including the scissile phosphate bound by a divalent metal ion cofactor (Cd²(+)) that supports DNA cleavage. Finally, the observed active site rearrangements when the transposase binds a metal ion in which it is inactive provide a clear rationale for metal ion specificity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBinding SitesCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDeinococcusDNA, BacterialDNA, Single-StrandedDNA Transposable ElementsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein Structure, SecondarySequence AlignmentTransposasesZincDNA, BacterialDNA, Single-StrandedDNA Transposable ElementsTransposasesZinc

Identifiers

PMID20890269
PMCPMC2989099
OpenAlexW2061341324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.