Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20889780›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Identification of MET10-932 and characterization as an allele reducing hydrogen sulfide formation in wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Angela Linderholm, Kevin Dietzel, Marissa Hirst, Linda F Bisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biocontainment efficacy redefined.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Marker Assisted Selection of Malic-ConsumingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Flavour-active wine yeasts.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2012
    Review
  13. Wine flavor and aroma.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela LinderholmDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, 595 Hilgard Lane, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Kevin Dietzel
Marissa Hirst
Linda F Bisson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vineyard isolate of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, UCD932, was identified as a strain producing little or no detectable hydrogen sulfide during wine fermentation. Genetic analysis revealed that this trait segregated as a single genetic determinant. The gene also conferred a white colony phenotype on BiGGY agar (bismuth-glucose-glycine-yeast agar), which is thought to indicate low basal levels of sulfite reductase activity. However, this isolate does not display a requirement for S-containing amino acids, indicating that the sulfate reduction pathway is fully operational. Genetic crosses against known mutations conferring white colony color on BiGGY agar identified the gene leading to reduced H(2)S formation as an allele of MET10 (MET10-932), which encodes a catalytic subunit of sulfite reductase. Sequence analysis of MET10-932 revealed several corresponding amino acid differences in relation to laboratory strain S288C. Allele differences for other genes of the sulfate reduction pathway were also detected in UCD932. The MET10 allele of UCD932 was found to be unique in comparison to the sequences of several other vineyard isolates with differing levels of production of H(2)S. Replacing the MET10 allele of high-H(2)S-producing strains with MET10-932 prevented H(2)S formation by those strains. A single mutative change, corresponding to T662K, in MET10-932 resulted in a loss of H(2)S production. The role of site 662 in sulfide reduction was further analyzed by changing the encoded amino acid at this position. A change back to threonine or to the conservative serine fully restored the H(2)S formation conferred by this allele. In addition to T662K, arginine, tryptophan, and glutamic acid substitutions similarly reduced sulfide formation.

Indexed as

AllelesCrosses, GeneticDNA, FungalHydrogen SulfideMolecular Sequence DataMutationOxidation-ReductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNASulfite Reductase (NADPH)WineDNA, FungalHydrogen SulfideSulfite Reductase (NADPH)sulfite reductase (NADPH), S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID20889780
PMCPMC2988593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.