Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20888834›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

Mechanism of fiber assembly: treatment of Aβ peptide aggregation with a coarse-grained united-residue force field.

Ana Rojas, Adam Liwo, Dana Browne, Harold A Scheraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Martini on the Rocks: Can a Coarse-Grained Force Field Model Crystals?The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  5. Mapping the configurational landscape and aggregation phase behavior of the tau protein fragment PHF6.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational Models for the Study of Protein Aggregation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Probing Protein Aggregation Using the Coarse-Grained UNRES Force Field.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. My 65 years in protein chemistry.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana RojasDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Adam Liwo
Dana Browne
Harold A Scheraga

Funding

INTERNAL BONDIN IN PROTEINSR01GM014312 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI MAISURADZE, GIA, RACKOVSKY, SHALOM R · 1985 to 2021
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-14312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM014312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth mechanism of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide fibrils was studied by a physics-based coarse-grained united-residue model and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. To identify the mechanism of monomer addition to an Aβ(1-40) fibril, we placed an unstructured monomer at a distance of 20 Å from a fibril template and allowed it to interact freely with the latter. The monomer was not biased towards fibril conformation by either the force field or the MD algorithm. With the use of a coarse-grained model with replica-exchange molecular dynamics, a longer timescale was accessible, making it possible to observe how the monomers probe different binding modes during their search for the fibril conformation. Although different assembly pathways were seen, they all follow a dock-lock mechanism with two distinct locking stages, consistent with experimental data on fibril elongation. Whereas these experiments have not been able to characterize the conformations populating the different stages, we have been able to describe these different stages explicitly by following free monomers as they dock onto a fibril template and to adopt the fibril conformation (i.e., we describe fibril elongation step by step at the molecular level). During the first stage of the assembly ("docking"), the monomer tries different conformations. After docking, the monomer is locked into the fibril through two different locking stages. In the first stage, the monomer forms hydrogen bonds with the fibril template along one of the strands in a two-stranded β-hairpin; in the second stage, hydrogen bonds are formed along the second strand, locking the monomer into the fibril structure. The data reveal a free-energy barrier separating the two locking stages. The importance of hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds in the stability of the Aβ fibril structure was examined by carrying out additional canonical MD simulations of oligomers with different numbers of chains (4-16 chains), with the fibril structure as the initial conformation. The data confirm that the structures are stabilized largely by hydrophobic interactions and show that intermolecular hydrogen bonds are highly stable and contribute to the stability of the oligomers as well.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationAmyloid beta-PeptidesBinding SitesBiophysical PhenomenaHumansHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIn Vitro TechniquesModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationMultiprotein ComplexesPeptide FragmentsProtein StabilityProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein Structure, SecondaryAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)Multiprotein ComplexesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID20888834
PMCPMC2981693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.