Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20888287›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2010

The future of the β-lactams.

Leticia I Llarrull, Sebastian A Testero, Jed F Fisher, Shahriar Mobashery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. OXA β-lactamases frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structure-Based Discovery of Lipoteichoic Acid Synthase Inhibitors.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanism of the Kinugasa Reaction Revisited.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Development ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leticia I LlarrullDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Sebastian A Testero
Jed F Fisher
Shahriar Mobashery

Funding

RESISTANCE TO BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICSR01AI033170 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOBASHERY, SHAHRIAR · 1992 to 2010
$3.4M
Maturation of Bacterial Cell WallR01AI090348 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI MOBASHERY, SHAHRIAR · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033170NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 80 years since their discovery the β-lactam antibiotics have progressed through structural generations, each in response to the progressive evolution of bacterial resistance mechanisms. The generational progression was driven by the ingenious, but largely empirical, manipulation of structure by medicinal chemists. Nonetheless, the true creative force in these efforts was Nature, and as the discovery of new β-lactams from Nature has atrophied while at the same time multi-resistant and opportunistic bacterial pathogens have burgeoned, the time for empirical drug discovery has passed. We concisely summarize recent developments with respect to bacterial resistance, the identity of the new β-lactams, and the emerging non-empirical strategies that will ensure that this incredible class of antibiotics has a future.

Indexed as

beta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactam ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Infectionsbeta-LactamsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsMonobactamsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsMonobactams

Identifiers

PMID20888287
PMCPMC6878888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.