Trial reportNonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences2010
Modeling early sexual initiation among young adolescents using quantum and continuous behavior change methods: implications for HIV prevention.
Trial report in Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00774592 (Adolescent Risk Reduction in the Bahamas-Peers and Parents), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adolescent Risk Reduction in the Bahamas-Peers and Parents
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantum changes in self-efficacy and condom-use intention among youth: A chained cusp catastrophe model.Journal of adolescence · 2018Article
- Cusp Catastrophe Regression and Its Application in Public Health and Behavioral Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- A physical model for dementia.Physica A · 2017Article
- Protection motivation theory and cigarette smoking among vocational high school students in China: a cusp catastrophe modeling analysis.Global health research and policy · 2016Article
- Cusp Catastrophe Polynomial Model: Power and Sample Size Estimation.Open journal of statistics · 2014Article
- Intention to use condom, cusp modeling, and evaluation of an HIV prevention intervention trial.Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral research and prevention intervention science efforts have largely been based on hypotheses of linear or rational behavior change. Additional advances in the field may result from the integration of quantum behavior change and catastrophe models. Longitudinal data from a randomized trial for 1241 pre-adolescents 9-12 years old who self-described as virgin were analyzed. Data for 469 virgins in the control group were included for linear and cusp catastrophe models to describe sexual initiation; data for the rest in the intervention group were added for program effect assessment. Self-reported likelihood to have sex was positively associated with actual initiation of sex (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.43-2.06, R² = 0.13). Receipt of a behavioral prevention intervention based on a cognitive model prevented 15.6% (33.0% vs. 48.6%, OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.24-1.11) of the participants from initiating sex among only those who reported 'very likely to have sex.' The beta coefficients for the cubic term of the usp assessing three bifurcating variables (planning to have sex, intrinsic rewards from sex and self-efficacy for abstinence) were 0.0726, 0.1116 and 0.1069 respectively; R² varied from 0.49 to 0.54 (p < 0.001 for all). Although an intervention based on a model of continuous behavior change did produce a modest impact on sexual initiation, quantum change has contributed more than continuous change in describing sexual initiation among young adolescents, suggesting the need for quantum change and chaotic models to advance behavioral prevention of HIV/AIDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20887691PMC3013356W1610077203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.