ReviewWomen's health (London, England)2010
Celiac disease: an underappreciated issue in women’s health.
Review in Women's health (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Testing of the Coeliac Disease Food Attitudes and Behaviours Scale in Brazil.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Article
- Women's Health Disorders in a Coeliac Disease Population After Diagnosis-A Nationwide Cohort Analysis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Observational
- Exploring the link between celiac disease and obesity: a potential role of gut microbiome.Intestinal research · 2025Article
- Review
- Gluten and Wheat in Women's Health: Beyond the Gut.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Gluten-Free Product Recalls and Their Impact on Consumer Trust.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Primary amenorrhoea as a manifestation of coeliac disease.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-of-Care Test for Celiac Disease Antibody Screening among Infertile Patients.Inflammatory intestinal diseases · 2019Article
- To Be or Not to Be a Pathogen:Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Unrecognised coeliac disease among men and women undergoing fertility treatment: A screening study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Ovarian Reserve Assessment in Celiac Patients of Reproductive Age.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- IL-9 Integrates the Host-Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Celiac disease and obstetrical-gynecological contribution.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2016Review
- Extraintestinal manifestations of coeliac disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015Review
- Results from ad hoc and routinely collected data among celiac women with infertility or pregnancy related disorders: Italy, 2001-2011.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated enteropathy that is secondary to gluten ingestion and classically associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Diagnosis is based on serology and confirmatory duodenal biopsy, and the only treatment is lifelong avoidance of gluten. CD has been increasingly recognized to encompass a wide variety of manifestations that are relevant to women’s health, including infertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes and reduced BMD. Currently, CD is underdiagnosed, largely owing to lack of recognition of the diverse manifestations by general practitioners. Increased awareness of the clinical spectrum of this disease, as well as targeted testing in at-risk individuals (including women with unexplained infertility and previous adverse pregnancy outcomes, and in specific populations with reduced BMD) is greatly needed in order to improve rates of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.