ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2010
Interactions between cigarette smoking and selected polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in risk for colorectal cancer: A case-only analysis.
Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated clinical genomic analysis reveals xenobiotic metabolic genes are downregulated in meningiomas of current smokers.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Risk of Colorectal Carcinoma May Predispose to the Genetic Variants of theInternational journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Maternal-fetal metabolic gene-gene interactions and risk of neural tube defects.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2014Article
- Impact of interactions of cigarette smoking with NAT2 polymorphisms on rheumatoid arthritis risk in African Americans.Arthritis and rheumatism · 2012Article
- Article
- Development of fluorescent substrates for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and application to inhibition studies.Analytical biochemistry · 2011Article
- Colonic polyps: inheritance, susceptibility, risk evaluation, and diagnostic management.Cancer management and research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The metabolism of xenobiotics is complex and involves multiple steps and multiple enzymes. Genetic variation in the genes encoding these enzymes as well as the level of exposure to the substrates of these enzymes could alter metabolism and clearance of potential carcinogens and thus alter cancer susceptibility. This study examined interaction effect between smoking and two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)-CYP1A1 c.1384A>G (p.Ile462Val) and EPHX1 c.337T>C (p.Tyr113His)-in modulating colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The SNPs were selected a priori based on functional significance. In a case-only analysis, unconditional logistic regression was used to examine the associations between smoking and each SNP and between the two SNPs in 786 patients with nonfamilial CRC. There was significant multiplicative interaction for CRC risk between smoking and EPHX1 c.337T>C (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.81, P = 0.03), particularly among smokers with a history of greater than 20 pack-years of smoking (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.07-2.16, P = 0.02). In addition, there was gene-gene interaction between EPHX1 c.337T>C and CYP1A1 c.1384A>G (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.02-2.55, P = 0.04). Smokers with any variant allele of EPHX1 were at increased risk for CRC, as were individuals with any variant allele of CYP1A1 together with any variant allele of EPHX1. Thus, the study of gene-environment and gene-gene interactions may help to identify high-risk subgroups that can be targeted for intensive smoking cessation and CRC screening interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.