ArticleExpert opinion on medical diagnostics2010
Advances and challenges in biomarker development for type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention using omic technologies.
Article in Expert opinion on medical diagnostics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression-based Genome-wide Association Study Links OPN and IL1-RA With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes in Children.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
- Novel serum proteomic biomarkers for early diagnosis and aggressive grade identification of prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Luminex and other multiplex high throughput technologies for the identification of, and host response to, environmental triggers of type 1 diabetes.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- Immunological biomarkers: catalysts for translational advances in autoimmune diabetes.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importance of the fieldBiomarkers are essential for the identification of high risk children as well as monitoring of prevention outcomes for type 1 diabetes (T1D). AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This review discusses progress, opportunities and challenges in biomarker discovery and validation using high throughput genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic technologies. The authors also suggest potential solutions to deal with the current challenges. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Readers will gain an overview of the current status on T1D biomarkers, an integrated review of three omic technologies, their applications and limitations for biomarker discovery and validation, and a critical discussion of the major issues encountered in biomarker development. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Better biomarkers are still urgently needed for T1D prediction and prevention. The high throughput omic technologies offer great opportunities but also face significant challenges that have to be solved before their potential for biomarker development is fully realized.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.