Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20885785›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome.

Robert S Illingworth, Ulrike Gruenewald-Schneider, Shaun Webb, Alastair R W Kerr, Keith D James, Daniel J Turner, Colin Smith, David J Harrison, Robert Andrews, Adrian P Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 309 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetic Patterns in Musculoskeletal Disease: Methylation ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Roles of transposable elements and DNA methylation in the formation of CpG islands and CpG-depleted regulatory elements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert S IllingworthWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ulrike Gruenewald-Schneider
Shaun Webb
Alastair R W Kerr
Keith D James
Daniel J Turner
Colin Smith
David J Harrison
Robert Andrews
Adrian P Bird

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800026Medical Research Council G0900627Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 077224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CpG islands (CGIs) are vertebrate genomic landmarks that encompass the promoters of most genes and often lack DNA methylation. Querying their apparent importance, the number of CGIs is reported to vary widely in different species and many do not co-localise with annotated promoters. We set out to quantify the number of CGIs in mouse and human genomes using CXXC Affinity Purification plus deep sequencing (CAP-seq). We also asked whether CGIs not associated with annotated transcripts share properties with those at known promoters. We found that, contrary to previous estimates, CGI abundance in humans and mice is very similar and many are at conserved locations relative to genes. In each species CpG density correlates positively with the degree of H3K4 trimethylation, supporting the hypothesis that these two properties are mechanistically interdependent. Approximately half of mammalian CGIs (>10,000) are "orphans" that are not associated with annotated promoters. Many orphan CGIs show evidence of transcriptional initiation and dynamic expression during development. Unlike CGIs at known promoters, orphan CGIs are frequently subject to DNA methylation during development, and this is accompanied by loss of their active promoter features. In colorectal tumors, however, orphan CGIs are not preferentially methylated, suggesting that cancer does not recapitulate a developmental program. Human and mouse genomes have similar numbers of CGIs, over half of which are remote from known promoters. Orphan CGIs nevertheless have the characteristics of functional promoters, though they are much more likely than promoter CGIs to become methylated during development and hence lose these properties. The data indicate that orphan CGIs correspond to previously undetected promoters whose transcriptional activity may play a functional role during development.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAdultAnimalsBase SequenceChromatography, AffinityColorectal NeoplasmsConserved SequenceCpG IslandsDNA MethylationFemaleGenomeHistonesHumansLysineMaleMammalsHistonesLysine

Identifiers

PMID20885785
PMCPMC2944787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.