Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20884731›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2010

Process evaluation of a tobacco prevention program in Indian schools--methods, results and lessons learnt.

Shifalika Goenka, Abha Tewari, Monika Arora, Melissa H Stigler, Cheryl L Perry, J P Saulina Arnold, Sangita Kulathinal, K Srinath Reddy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. School-based programmes for preventing smoking.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. More on the tobacco menace in India.South Asian journal of cancer · 2014
    Article
  16. Review
  17. An Informal School-based, Peer-led Intervention for Prevention of Tobacco Consumption in Adolescence: A Cluster Randomized Trial in Rural Gandhinagar.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shifalika GoenkaCentre for Chronic Disease Control, Delhi, India. shifalika.goenka@iiphd.org
Abha Tewari
Monika Arora
Melissa H Stigler
Cheryl L Perry
J P Saulina Arnold
Sangita Kulathinal
K Srinath Reddy

Funding

Mobilizing Youth for Action Against Tobacco in IndiaR01TW005952 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PERRY, CHERYL LEE · 2002 to 2006
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW005952FIC NIH HHS R01TW05952-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, 57% of men between 15 and 54 years and 10.8% of women between 15 and 49 years use tobacco. A wide variety of tobacco gets used and the poor and the underprivileged are the dominant victims of tobacco and its adverse consequences. Project MYTRI (Mobilizing Youth for Tobacco-Related Initiatives in India) was a tobacco prevention intervention program, a cluster-randomized trial in 32 Indian schools which aimed to decrease susceptibility to tobacco use among sixth- to ninth-grade students in urban settings in India. This culture-specific intervention, which addressed both smokeless and smoked forms of tobacco, was Indian in content and communication. We qualitatively developed indicators which would help accurately measure the dose of the intervention given, received and reached. A multi-staged process evaluation was done through both subjective and objective measures. Training the teachers critically contributed toward a rigorous implementation and also correlated with the outcomes, as did a higher proportion of students participating in the classroom discussions and better peer-leader-student communication. A sizeable proportion of subjective responses were 'socially desirable', making objective assessment a preferred methodology even for 'dose received'. The peer-led health activism was successful. Teachers' manuals need to be concise.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationSchoolsSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20884731
PMCPMC3003490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.