Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20884354›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2011

Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI.

Srikanth Ryali, Kaustubh Supekar, Tianwen Chen, Vinod Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Srikanth RyaliDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5778, USA. sryali@stanford.edu
Kaustubh Supekar
Tianwen Chen
Vinod Menon

Funding

Interventions in Math Learning Disabilities: Cognitive and Neural CorrelatesR01HD059205 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vinod Menon · 2009 to 2026
$10.8M
Longitudinal fMRI Studies of Mathematical DisabilitiesR01HD047520 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2005 to 2014
$5.5M
Cognitive Neuroscience of Mathematical DevelopmentR01HD057610 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2009 to 2010
$639k
Multivariate Dynamical Systems Methods for Identifying Causal Interactions in fMRR21NS071221 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2011 to 2012
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS HD047520NICHD NIH HHS HD057610NICHD NIH HHS HD059205NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047520NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057610NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059205NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS071221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of dynamical interactions between distributed brain areas is of fundamental importance for understanding cognitive information processing. However, estimating dynamic causal interactions between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) poses several unique challenges. For one, fMRI measures Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signals, rather than the underlying latent neuronal activity. Second, regional variations in the hemodynamic response function (HRF) can significantly influence estimation of causal interactions between them. Third, causal interactions between brain regions can change with experimental context over time. To overcome these problems, we developed a novel state-space Multivariate Dynamical Systems (MDS) model to estimate intrinsic and experimentally-induced modulatory causal interactions between multiple brain regions. A probabilistic graphical framework is then used to estimate the parameters of MDS as applied to fMRI data. We show that MDS accurately takes into account regional variations in the HRF and estimates dynamic causal interactions at the level of latent signals. We develop and compare two estimation procedures using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and variational Bayesian (VB) approaches for inferring model parameters. Using extensive computer simulations, we demonstrate that, compared to Granger causal analysis (GCA), MDS exhibits superior performance for a wide range of signal to noise ratios (SNRs), sample length and network size. Our simulations also suggest that GCA fails to uncover causal interactions when there is a conflict between the direction of intrinsic and modulatory influences. Furthermore, we show that MDS estimation using VB methods is more robust and performs significantly better at low SNRs and shorter time series than MDS with MLE. Our study suggests that VB estimation of MDS provides a robust method for estimating and interpreting causal network interactions in fMRI data.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBrainHemodynamicsHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID20884354
PMCPMC2997172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.