Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20884293›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2010

Allostery and population shift in drug discovery.

Gozde Kar, Ozlem Keskin, Attila Gursoy, Ruth Nussinov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Allostery in Biomolecular Condensates.Journal of molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. How residence time works in allosteric drugs.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gozde KarCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics and College of Engineering, Koc University Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sariyer Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozlem Keskin
Attila Gursoy
Ruth Nussinov

Funding

Biomolecular Recognition and Binding MechanismsZIABC010441 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NUSSINOV, RUTH · 2009 to 2025
$9.4M
Biomolecular Recognition and Binding MechanismsZ01BC010441 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NUSSINOV, RUTH · 2002 to 2008
$1.2M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010441NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins can exist in a large number of conformations around their native states that can be characterized by an energy landscape. The landscape illustrates individual valleys, which are the conformational substates. From the functional standpoint, there are two key points: first, all functionally relevant substates pre-exist; and second, the landscape is dynamic and the relative populations of the substates will change following allosteric events. Allosteric events perturb the structure, and the energetic strain propagates and shifts the population. This can lead to changes in the shapes and properties of target binding sites. Here we present an overview of dynamic conformational ensembles focusing on allosteric events in signaling. We propose that combining equilibrium fluctuation concepts with genomic screens could help drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProtein ConformationAllosteric RegulationBinding SitesHumansModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein BindingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20884293
PMCPMC7316380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.