Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20883614›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Management of first-episode pelvic inflammatory disease in primary care: results from a large UK primary care database.

Amanda Nicholson, Greta Rait, Tarita Murray-Thomas, Gwenda Hughes, Catherine H Mercer, Jackie Cassell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda NicholsonDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, Brighton. a.c.nicholson@bsms.ac.uk
Greta Rait
Tarita Murray-Thomas
Gwenda Hughes
Catherine H Mercer
Jackie Cassell

Funding

Department of Health PAS/01/05/PDA/048Medical Research Council G0200565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrompt and effective treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) may help prevent long-term complications. Many PID cases are seen in primary care but it is not known how well management follows recommended guidelines.

aimTo estimate the incidence of first-episode PID cases seen in UK general practice, describe their management, and assess its adequacy in relation to existing guidelines. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cohort study.

settingUK general practices contributing to the General Practice Research Database (GPRD).

methodWomen aged 15 to 40 years, consulting with a first episode of PID occurring between 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2008 were identified, based on the presence of a diagnostic code. The records within 28 days either side of the diagnosis date were analysed to describe management.

resultsA total of 3797 women with a first-ever coded diagnosis of PID were identified. Incidence fell during the study period from 19.3 to 8.9/10 000 person-years. Thirty-four per cent of cases had evidence of care elsewhere, while 2064 (56%) appeared to have been managed wholly within the practice. Of these 2064 women, 34% received recommended treatment including metronidazole, and 54% had had a Chlamydia trachomatis test, but only 16% received both. Management was more likely to follow guidelines in women in their 20s, and later in the study period.

conclusionThese analyses suggest that the management of PID in UK primary care, although improving, does not follow recommended guidelines for the majority of women. Further research is needed to understand the delivery of care in general practice and the coding of such complex syndromic conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Infective AgentsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsEpidemiologic MethodsFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMetronidazolePelvic Inflammatory DiseasePractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective AgentsMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID20883614
PMCPMC2944949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.