Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20883055›Full record

ReviewDrugs2010

Cetuximab: a review of its use in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

James E Frampton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in molecular targeted therapies to increase efficacy of (chemo)radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cisplatin versus cetuximab given concomitantly with radiotherapy in non-resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an open question.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Immune biomarkers of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer.Seminars in cancer biology · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E FramptonAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Mairangi Bay, North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cetuximab (Erbitux®) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGFR is overexpressed and/or upregulated in most squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN); this overexpression is associated with more aggressive disease and poorer prognosis. In the EU, cetuximab is approved in combination with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced SCCHN and in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. In randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III clinical trials, cetuximab plus radiotherapy significantly improved the duration of locoregional control (primary endpoint) compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced SCCHN, while cetuximab plus first-line platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (primary endpoint) compared with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy alone in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. The efficacy benefits of cetuximab-based combination therapy were achieved without an adverse impact on patients' health-related quality of life. In addition, cetuximab had an acceptable tolerability profile when added to radiotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy; in particular, it did not exacerbate the toxicities commonly associated with these other treatment modalities. Cetuximab-related adverse events, which include skin rash, hypomagnesaemia and infusion-related reactions, are mostly mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Thus, cetuximab-based combination therapy is a valuable treatment option in patients with SCCHN. In the setting of locally advanced, unresectable disease, cetuximab plus radiotherapy offers an alternative approach to the current standard of care, namely platinum-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). Based on informal comparisons, cetuximab plus radiotherapy appears to be at least as effective as chemoradiotherapy and, moreover, less toxic; however, formal comparisons of these regimens are required before their relative efficacy and tolerability can be conclusively determined. In the setting of recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy provides a first-line treatment of choice for fit patients in whom palliative chemotherapy is indicated.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID20883055
OpenAlexW2084745864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.