Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20882288›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica2010

Molecular diagnostics of CNS embryonal tumors.

Stefan M Pfister, Andrey Korshunov, Marcel Kool, Martin Hasselblatt, Charles Eberhart, Michael D Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pediatric Brain Tumors: Innovative Genomic Information Is Transforming the Diagnostic and Clinical Landscape.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cytogenetic prognostication within medulloblastoma subgroups.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefan M PfisterGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. s.pfister@dkfz.de
Andrey Korshunov
Marcel Kool
Martin Hasselblatt
Charles Eberhart
Michael D Taylor
German Cancer Research Center · DEAcademic Medical Center · NLHospital for Sick Children · CAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

Notch signaling in brain tumorsR01NS055089 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EBERHART, CHARLES G · 2007 to 2016
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tremendous progress has recently been made in both molecular subgrouping, and the establishment of prognostic biomarkers for embryonal brain tumors, particularly medulloblastoma. Several prognostic biomarkers that were initially identified in retrospective cohorts of medulloblastoma, including MYC and MYCN amplification, nuclear β-catenin accumulation, and chromosome 17 aberrations have now been validated in clinical trials. Moreover, molecular subgroups based on distinct transcriptome profiles have been consistently reported from various groups on different platforms demonstrating that the concept of distinct medulloblastoma subgroups is very robust. Well-described subgroups of medulloblastomas include tumors showing wingless signaling pathway (Wnt) activation, and another characterized by sonic hedgehog pathway activity. Two or more additional subgroups were consistently reported to contain the vast majority of high-risk tumors, including most tumors with metastatic disease at diagnosis and/or large cell/anaplastic histology. Several years ago, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) was recognized as a separate entity based on its distinct biology and particularly aggressive clinical behavior. These tumors may occur supra or infratentorially and are usually found to have genetic alterations of SMARCB1 (INI1/hSNF5), a tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 22q. Subsequent loss of SMARCB1 protein expression comprises a relatively specific and sensitive diagnostic marker for AT/RT. For CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors (CNS PNETs), a consistent finding has been that they are molecularly distinct from medulloblastoma. Furthermore, a distinct fraction of CNS PNETs with particularly poor prognosis only occurring in young children was delineated, which was previously labeled ependymoblastoma or embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR) and which is morphologically characterized by the presence of multilayered "ependymoblastic" rosettes. This group of tumors shows a unique cytogenetic abnormality not seen in other brain tumors: focal amplification of a micro-RNA cluster at chromosome 19q13.42, which has never been found to be amplified in other CNS PNETs, medulloblastoma or AT/RT. In summary, these consistent findings have significantly contributed to our ability to sub-classify embryonal brain tumors into clinically and biologically meaningful strata and, for some of the subgroups, have led to the identification of specific targets for future development of molecularly targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalPathology, Molecular

Identifiers

PMID20882288
PMCPMC4512653
OpenAlexW2130080665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.