ArticleCurrent microbiology2011
Diversity of Burkholderia cepacia complex from the Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) rhizhosphere soil.
Article in Current microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and characterization of Burkholderia multivorans CCA53.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Isolation and characterization of Burkholderia rinojensis sp. nov., a non-Burkholderia cepacia complex soil bacterium with insecticidal and miticidal activities.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of cross-linked chitosan-glutaraldehyde.Marine drugs · 2013Article
- Diversity of potential pathogenicity and biofilm formation among Burkholderia cepacia complex water, clinical, and agricultural isolates in China.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2012Article
- Characterization and inference of gene gain/loss along burkholderia evolutionary history.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the existence of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) at species level and the predominant species in the environment of moso bamboo plantations in Hangzhou, China. A total of 423 isolates were recovered from moso bamboo rhizhosphere soil samples of three sites on the selective medium during 2007-2008. Isolates were identified by Bcc-specific PCR assays, followed by recA-restriction fragment length polymorphism assays, species-specific PCR analysis, recA gene sequencing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme, and BOX-PCR fingerprinting for genomic diversity. Out of 423 isolates, 278 isolates were assigned to the following Bcc species, eight B. stabilis, 26 B. anthina, 193 B. pyrrocinia, and 51 B. arboris, which indicated B. pyrrocinia as the most dominant species followed by B. arboris. Moreover, false positives were observed in certain isolates of B. arboris while performing species-specific PCR test. Furthermore, the results of recA gene sequence similarity and MLST data demonstrated that nine isolates formed a single discrete cluster but were PCR negative to species-specific primers representing novel species may exist within the Bcc. In addition, BOX-PCR fingerprinting for all the Bcc isolates also showed the strain diversity. It is the first report of the existence of B. arboris and predominance of B. pyrrocinia in the moso bamboo environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.