Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20882270›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2011

Mesh-related chronic infections in silicone-coated polyester suburethral slings.

Joseph K-S Lee, Gerard Agnew, Peter L Dwyer

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Histopathology of excised midurethral sling mesh.International urogynecology journal · 2015
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2012
    Article
  6. The 75% rule: all stress incontinence procedures are alike.International urogynecology journal · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph K-S LeeDepartment of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, 169 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Melbourne, 3084 VIC, Australia. jlee@mercy.com.au
Gerard Agnew
Peter L Dwyer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisdespite claims of equivalence to the tension-free vaginal tape, a variety of suburethral slings have been introduced, with various modifications. Complications in certain synthetic slings and meshes have led to a recent FDA public health notification.

methodswe report the case histories and management of five women with complications following implant of an InFast sling.

resultsfour of the five patients presented with symptom of chronic vaginal discharge, one presenting with irritative voiding symptoms and bladder pain. Resolution of presenting symptoms requires total removal of this silicone-coated polyester mesh, which often requires a combined vaginal-abdominal approach.

conclusionsthe silicone-coated mesh of the AMS InFAST sling, can become a focus for chronic infection forming a sinus tract into the vagina or other viscus, causing symptoms years after its placement.

Indexed as

PolyestersSiliconesAdultAgedBacterial InfectionsDevice RemovalFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPainSuburethral SlingsSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressPolyestersSilicones

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.