Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20881944›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2011

The roles of dopamine and serotonin in decision making: evidence from pharmacological experiments in humans.

Robert D Rogers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Role of the Serotonergic System in Time Perception: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Acetaminophen enhances the reflective learning process.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Serotonin selectively modulates reward value in human decision-making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert D RogersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK. robert.rogers@psych.ox.ac.uk
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurophysiological experiments in primates, alongside neuropsychological and functional magnetic resonance investigations in humans, have significantly enhanced our understanding of the neural architecture of decision making. In this review, I consider the more limited database of experiments that have investigated how dopamine and serotonin activity influences the choices of human adults. These include those experiments that have involved the administration of drugs to healthy controls, experiments that have tested genotypic influences upon dopamine and serotonin function, and, finally, some of those experiments that have examined the effects of drugs on the decision making of clinical samples. Pharmacological experiments in humans are few in number and face considerable methodological challenges in terms of drug specificity, uncertainties about pre- vs post-synaptic modes of action, and interactions with baseline cognitive performance. However, the available data are broadly consistent with current computational models of dopamine function in decision making and highlight the dissociable roles of dopamine receptor systems in the learning about outcomes that underpins value-based decision making. Moreover, genotypic influences on (interacting) prefrontal and striatal dopamine activity are associated with changes in choice behavior that might be relevant to understanding exploratory behaviors and vulnerability to addictive disorders. Manipulations of serotonin in laboratory tests of decision making in human participants have provided less consistent results, but the information gathered to date indicates a role for serotonin in learning about bad decision outcomes, non-normative aspects of risk-seeking behavior, and social choices involving affiliation and notions of fairness. Finally, I suggest that the role played by serotonin in the regulation of cognitive biases, and representation of context in learning, point toward a role in the cortically mediated cognitive appraisal of reinforcers when selecting between actions, potentially accounting for its influence upon the processing salient aversive outcomes and social choice.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningBrainBrain ChemistryCognitionDecision MakingDopamineDopamine AgentsHumansNeuropharmacologyReinforcement, PsychologySerotoninSerotonin AgentsDopamineDopamine AgentsSerotoninSerotonin Agents

Identifiers

PMID20881944
PMCPMC3055502
OpenAlexW2072830977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.