Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20880935›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2010

Longevity of clonal plants: why it matters and how to measure it.

Lucienne C de Witte, Jürg Stöcklin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Typical Rhizomatous Clonal GrassEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  7. Assessing limits of sustainable seed harvest in wild plant populations.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Genetic Diversity of the MacrophytePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. A somatic genetic clock for clonal species.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  12. A clock for clonal organisms.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Triggers and mediators of epigenetic remodeling in plants.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2023
    Review
  18. The sizes of life.PloS one · 2023
    Article
  19. Genetic diversity of the submerged macrophyteFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucienne C de WitteSection of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. Lucienne.dewitte@unibas.ch
Jürg Stöcklin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecies' life-history and population dynamics are strongly shaped by the longevity of individuals, but life span is one of the least accessible demographic traits, particularly in clonal plants. Continuous vegetative reproduction of genets enables persistence despite low or no sexual reproduction, affecting genet turnover rates and population stability. Therefore, the longevity of clonal plants is of considerable biological interest, but remains relatively poorly known. SCOPE: Here, we critically review the present knowledge on the longevity of clonal plants and discuss its importance for population persistence. Direct life-span measurements such as growth-ring analysis in woody plants are relatively easy to take, although, for many clonal plants, these methods are not adequate due to the variable growth pattern of ramets and difficult genet identification. Recently, indirect methods have been introduced in which genet size and annual shoot increments are used to estimate genet age. These methods, often based on molecular techniques, allow the investigation of genet size and age structure of whole populations, a crucial issue for understanding their viability and persistence. However, indirect estimates of clonal longevity are impeded because the process of ageing in clonal plants is still poorly understood and because their size and age are not always well correlated. Alternative estimators for genet life span such as somatic mutations have recently been suggested.

conclusionsEmpirical knowledge on the longevity of clonal species has increased considerably in the last few years. Maximum age estimates are an indicator of population persistence, but are not sufficient to evaluate turnover rates and the ability of long-lived clonal plants to enhance community stability and ecosystem resilience. In order to understand the dynamics of populations it will be necessary to measure genet size and age structure, not only life spans of single individuals, and to use such data for modelling of genet dynamics.

Indexed as

Cloning, OrganismPlant Physiological PhenomenaGenetics, PopulationPlantsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20880935
PMCPMC2990663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.