Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20880780›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2010

PET/CT and breast cancer.

C Hegarty, C D Collins

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04882371 (Comparison of MRI With PET / CT in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04882371 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of MRI With PET / CT in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorCem Ilgin ErolRan2018 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsBreast Cancer, Chemotherapy EffectArmsChemotherapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron emission tomography - Copmputer Tomography (PET-CT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C HegartySt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
C D Collins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper summarises the current status of PET/CT in relation to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID20880780
PMCPMC2967130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.