Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20880499›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2010

Functions of astrocytes and their potential as therapeutic targets.

Harold K Kimelberg, Maiken Nedergaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Cerebral Cortex Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The role of IPFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harold K KimelbergOrdway Research Institute, 150 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York 12208, USA. hkimelberg@ordwayresearch.org
Maiken Nedergaard

Funding

The Role of Astrocytes in Ischemic StrokeP01NS050315 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN · 2007 to 2011
$6.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS50350NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS050315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are often referred to, and historically have been regarded as, support cells of the mammalian CNS. Work over the last decade suggests otherwise-that astrocytes may in fact play a more active role in higher neural processing than previously recognized. Because astrocytes can potentially serve as novel therapeutic targets, it is critical to understand how astrocytes execute their diverse supportive tasks while maintaining neuronal health. To that end, this review focuses on the supportive roles of astrocytes, a line of study relevant to essentially all acute and chronic neurological diseases, and critically re-evaluates our concepts of the functional properties of astrocytes and relates these functions and properties to the intricate morphology of these cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsAquaporin 4AstrocytesCentral Nervous System DiseasesComplex Mixturesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansHydrogenModels, BiologicalPotassiumRegional Blood FlowWaterAntioxidantsAquaporin 4Complex Mixturesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidglutamevitHydrogenPotassiumWater

Identifiers

PMID20880499
PMCPMC2982258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.