Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20880379›Full record

ArticleImmunology2011

Phenotypic and functional characterization of a CD4(+) CD25(high) FOXP3(high) regulatory T-cell population in the dog.

Dammy Pinheiro, Yogesh Singh, Charlotte R Grant, Richard C Appleton, Flavio Sacchini, Kate R L Walker, Alden H Chadbourne, Charlotte A Palmer, Elizabeth Armitage-Chan, Ian Thompson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A review of CD4Veterinary immunology and immunopathology · 2024
    Review
  6. Canine peripheral non-conventional TCRαβFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Canine T-Cell Lymphoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Immunoregulatory Cells in Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dammy PinheiroRegulatory T Cell Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Yogesh Singh
Charlotte R Grant
Richard C Appleton
Flavio Sacchini
Kate R L Walker
Alden H Chadbourne
Charlotte A Palmer
Elizabeth Armitage-Chan
Ian Thompson
Lina Williamson
Fiona Cunningham
Oliver A Garden
Royal Veterinary College · GBIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale · ITNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F011180/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relatively little is known about regulatory T (Treg) cells and their functional responses in dogs. We have used the cross-reactive anti-mouse/rat Foxp3 antibody clone FJK-16s to identify a population of canine CD4(+) FOXP3(high) T cells in both the peripheral blood (PB) and popliteal lymph node (LN). FOXP3(+) cells in both PB and LN yielded positive staining with the newly developed anti-murine/human Helios antibody clone 22F6, consistent with the notion that they were naturally occurring Treg cells. Stimulation of mononuclear cells of LN origin with concanavalin A (Con A) in vitro yielded increased proportions and median fluorescence intensity of FOXP3 expression by both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Removal of the Con A and continued culture disclosed a CD4(+)  FOXP3(high) population, distinct from the CD4(+) FOXP3(intermediate) T cells; very few CD8(+) FOXP3(high) T cells were observed, though CD8(+) FOXP3(intermediate) cells were present in equal abundance to CD4(+) FOXP3(intermediate) cells. The CD4(+)  FOXP3(high) T cells were thought to represent activated Treg cells, in contrast to the FOXP3(intermediate) cells, which were thought to be a more heterogeneous population comprising predominantly activated conventional T cells. Co-staining with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) supported this notion, because the FOXP3(high) T cells were almost exclusively IFN-γ(-) , whereas the FOXP3(intermediate) cells expressed a more heterogeneous IFN-γ phenotype. Following activation of mononuclear cells with Con A and interleukin-2, the 5% of CD4(+) T cells showing the highest CD25 expression (CD4(+) CD25(high) ) were enriched in cells expressing FOXP3. These cells were anergic in vitro, in contrast to the 20% of CD4(+) T cells with the lowest CD25 expression (CD4(+) CD25(-) ), which proliferated readily. The CD4(+) CD25(high) FOXP3(high) T cells were able to suppress the proliferation of responder CD4(+) T cells in vitro, in contrast to the CD4(+) CD25(-) cells, which showed no regulatory properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4 AntigensCells, CulturedDogsForkhead Transcription FactorsInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitPhenotypeT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryCD4 AntigensForkhead Transcription FactorsInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit

Identifiers

PMID20880379
PMCPMC3015081
OpenAlexW1546448788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.