Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20878782›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2010

Ontogeny of cone photoreceptor mosaics in zebrafish.

W Ted Allison, Linda K Barthel, Kristina M Skebo, Masaki Takechi, Shoji Kawamura, Pamela A Raymond

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Fish Models of Ageing Retinal Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

W Ted AllisonDepartments of Biological Sciences and Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ted.allison@ualberta.ca
Linda K Barthel
Kristina M Skebo
Masaki Takechi
Shoji Kawamura
Pamela A Raymond
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Genetic analysis of cone photoreceptor determinationR01EY015509 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAYMOND, PAMELA A · 2005 to 2007
$908k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone photoreceptors in fish are typically arranged into a precise, reiterated pattern known as a "cone mosaic." Cone mosaic patterns can vary in different fish species and in response to changes in habitat, yet their function and the mechanisms of their development remain speculative. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have four cone subtypes arranged into precise rows in the adult retina. Here we describe larval zebrafish cone patterns and investigate a previously unrecognized transition between larval and adult cone mosaic patterns. Cone positions were determined in transgenic zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in their UV-sensitive cones, by the use of multiplex in situ hybridization labelling of various cone opsins. We developed a "mosaic metric" statistical tool to measure local cone order. We found that ratios of the various cone subtypes in larval and adult zebrafish were statistically different. The cone photoreceptors in larvae form a regular heterotypic mosaic array; i.e., the position of any one cone spectral subtype relative to the other cone subtypes is statistically different from random. However, the cone spectral subtypes in larval zebrafish are not arranged in continuous rows as in the adult. We used cell birth dating to show that the larval cone mosaic pattern remains as a distinct region within the adult retina and does not reorganize into the adult row pattern. In addition, the abundance of cone subtypes relative to other subtypes is different in this larval remnant compared with that of larvae or canonical adult zebrafish retina. These observations provide baseline data for understanding the development of cone mosaics via comparative analysis of larval and adult cone development in a model species.

Indexed as

RetinaAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell DifferentiationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLarvaOpsinsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsZebrafishGreen Fluorescent ProteinsOpsins

Identifiers

PMID20878782
PMCPMC3376642
OpenAlexW2068475141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.